<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BioShock 2: Too Much of a Good Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tippingglass.com/entertainment/bioshock-2-too-much-of-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tippingglass.com/entertainment/bioshock-2-too-much-of-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>You Get What You Pay For</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://tippingglass.com/entertainment/bioshock-2-too-much-of-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tippingglass.com/?p=891#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I have actually said the same thing about actually liking the fact that the original Bioshock was solely a single player story game.  I think both of our stances on the sequel proves that it was ultimately the better approach.  I think 2k felt like they needed to bring the sequel into the multiplayer realm to answer the criticism, and to increase revenue potential for the game with DLC.  

The multiplayer is actually pretty entertaining, but does not compare to online juggernauts like COD Modern Warfare 2, for example.  They would have been better suited to focus on the strengths of the original rather than trying to adapt to the criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have actually said the same thing about actually liking the fact that the original Bioshock was solely a single player story game.  I think both of our stances on the sequel proves that it was ultimately the better approach.  I think 2k felt like they needed to bring the sequel into the multiplayer realm to answer the criticism, and to increase revenue potential for the game with DLC.  </p>
<p>The multiplayer is actually pretty entertaining, but does not compare to online juggernauts like COD Modern Warfare 2, for example.  They would have been better suited to focus on the strengths of the original rather than trying to adapt to the criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://tippingglass.com/entertainment/bioshock-2-too-much-of-a-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tippingglass.com/?p=891#comment-281</guid>
		<description>I think we have similar feelings about this game. Bioshock 2 was a great game, better than most games out there, but when you have to compare it against its predecessor, it just doesn&#039;t match up well.

I know I might be in the minority here, but I actually liked the fact that Bioshock was single player game. I think that sort of forced the developers to put all their resources towards such an incredible story. And that&#039;s exactly what Bioshock is, an incredible story. I&#039;ve never been sucked into a game quite like that before. Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we have similar feelings about this game. Bioshock 2 was a great game, better than most games out there, but when you have to compare it against its predecessor, it just doesn&#8217;t match up well.</p>
<p>I know I might be in the minority here, but I actually liked the fact that Bioshock was single player game. I think that sort of forced the developers to put all their resources towards such an incredible story. And that&#8217;s exactly what Bioshock is, an incredible story. I&#8217;ve never been sucked into a game quite like that before. Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
